the family evans – dirgewithoutmusic – Harry Potter – J. K. Rowling [Archive of Our Own]

ink-splotch:

What if, when Petunia Dursley found a little boy on her front doorstep, she took him in? Not into the cupboard under the stairs, not into a twisted childhood of tarnished worth and neglect—what if she took him in?

Petunia was jealous, selfish and vicious. We will not pretend she wasn’t. She looked at that boy on her doorstep and thought about her Dudders, barely a month older than this boy. She looked at his eyes and her stomach turned over and over. (Severus Snape saved Harry’s life for his eyes. Let’s have Petunia save it despite them).

Let’s tell a story where Petunia Dursley found a baby boy on her doorstep and hated his eyes—she hated them. She took him in and fed him and changed him and got him his shots, and she hated his eyes up until the day she looked at the boy and saw her nephew, not her sister’s shadow. When Harry was two and Vernon Dursley bought Dudley a toy car and Harry a fast food meal with a toy with parts he could choke on Petunia packed her things and got a divorce.

the family evans – dirgewithoutmusic – Harry Potter – J. K. Rowling [Archive of Our Own]

fluffmugger:

blaukrautsuppe:

hufflepuff-headcanons:

honestly the harry potter fandom is so wild like we’ve all collectively refused to accept cursed child as canon but some college kids tell us hufflepuffs are particularly good finders and we don’t even question it

I didn’t truly get the whole “death of the author” paradigm until I watched the harry potter fandom collectively divorce JKR

#also it’s not just cursed child#it’s also all the slytherin kids branded evil#it’s about ending a series with babies ever after#writing an epilogue designed for baby boomers in a series aimed at millennials#it’s harry naming his kid after two abusers#it’s about claiming dumbledore is gay for Diversity Points#but in a movie series featuring his life#and featuring the one he loved#there won’t be a trace of it#it’s about casting an abuser then making excuses for it#when hp is the story of an abuse survivor#it’s about everything to do with the american magical community#from cultural appropriation to the sheer pain of the term ‘no maj’#sorry rowling#you started us off#but now#our city now

evilkitten3:

njparr-writing:

evilkitten3:

accio-shitpost:

harry potter au where the potions master is gordon ramsey

okay but imagine this

gordon ramsay is the potions master the whole time, right?

so. lupin comes in and brings out the boggart. when neville goes up to it, it doesn’t transform into a teacher who’s been emotionally and verbally abusing him for three years (it likely turns into his grandmother, who’s probably been doing it for even longer, but at least seems to believe she’s doing the right thing, doesn’t seem to have any bad intentions, and does genuinely care about neville’s wellbeing). because that teacher doesn’t exist. neville doesn’t even go first, because no one publicly insulted him and lupin never needed to boost his self-confidence.

in fact, neville’s pretty good at potions. not great, because no one’s great at everything, but professor ramsay is always kind and understanding and gives him all the help he needs, never once criticizing him for making a mistake that anyone might’ve made.

hermione earns a buttload of points for gryffindor for helping neville when the professor is busy with other students. professor ramsay never once calls her a know-it-all, and by the time she’s in her sixth year she’s spending free periods as a teacher’s assistant.

despite being renowned for his temper, professor ramsay never once raises his voice at any students unless it’s absolutely necessary – as in, there’s a situation where someone may be in danger and yelling gets people’s attention. he isn’t here to yell at children; they aren’t contestants on a show. they’re here to learn, not to win a prize.

no one takes away harry’s quidditch throughout the ages book.

no one pretends not to notice when hermione’s teeth reach her chin.

no one actively encourages bullying.

no one makes people dread one of the most interesting classes in the school.

when professor ramsay tracks down lupin to give him his potion, there’s nothing blocking him from hearing them out and acting rationally. sirius black goes free, peter pettigrew goes to azkaban, and sybill trelawney never makes a second prediction.

but no one makes an unbreakable vow with narcissa malfoy, either. no one is there when draco malfoy realizes that, despite everything, he can’t look someone in the eye and take their life. dumbledore is forced to take his own life, because he truly believes it’s necessary, and maybe he’s right. but it doesn’t save draco. maybe no one ever could. three more fall to the dark lord – a death eater, his wife, and their beloved son.

when harry potter returns for the final battle, pansy parkinson says nothing. her ideals were shattered when her boyfriend died, and the fact that her father is still a death eater tells her that he cares more about his prejudice than he does about her.

slytherins fight in the battle to save hogwarts, and many of them die. millicent bulstrode never knew lavender brown, and didn’t like her much anyway, but that doesn’t stop her with hitting fenrir greyback with a dislodged stone from the castle wall until he stops moving. she goes to lavender’s funeral too, though she doesn’t know why.

crabbe and goyle fight one another. goyle was loyal to malfoy, in the end, and crabbe to the dark lord. both of them survive the fight, but it’s hard to tell who won. maybe nobody did.

dennis creevey and astoria greengrass have never met before, but they hold hands as they hear their siblings’ names listed among the causalities. dennis leaves the wizarding world – it took his brother away from him, and suddenly the magic isn’t so magical anymore. astoria follows. he keeps his wand, just in case, but she breaks hers. she never wants to see another spell again.

people died who might not have died. people lived who might not have lived.

when it was all over, harry potter stood over the body of tom riddle. maybe he wished he knew more about the past. maybe he was glad that he never would.

severus snape was never the potions master at hogwarts school of witchcraft and wizardry. gordon ramsay was.

one small change made another change, and then another and another and another until everything ended up different.

in the end, though, this is the story of harry potter. and, for him, it ends the same. he goes off into the world of adults, knowing a little bit more about potions than he otherwise might have. maybe not much about him has changed. maybe everything has.

he sits quietly with his cousin on christmas, their children trading uncomfortable looks in the awkward silence. “gordon ramsay taught my potions class,” he says, once. dudley nods. nothing really surprises him, anymore. professor ramsay might’ve retired by then, or he might’ve died in the war, or really any number of things could’ve happened. “do you think it mattered?” he wonders, aloud. it seems to come out of nowhere, and he isn’t really asking, but dudley wouldn’t know how to answer anyway.

they just sit there, two men from two different worlds, who will never fully understand one another. but maybe their children will, someday. or maybe not.

after all, how much difference can one man make?

What the shit you made me cry

Not fucking okay

😦 so well written though holy moly

i’m actually incredibly happy to hear that because it now means i can say “i once wrote an 860 word story about gordon ramsay at hogwarts and made someone cry” writing is fun

turtle-hearrrrrrrt:

opheliajane:

linmanuels:

cassiefae:

angstriddentrashhuman:

scipia-of-the-stella:

kyraneko:

cinnamonrolltoogayforthisworld:

gaelissfelin:

accio-shitpost:

tbh people mock harry for going back to rescue fleurs sister in the second triwizard task but harry knows dumbledore better than anyone else. he probably looked at the situation and thought “would dumbledore let an eight year old drown just because fleur couldnt do this bit? yes. yes he would.”

it’s also possible he was acting off of the lessons he learned in the abusive dursley household. that’s why he does a lot of his so-called “hero complex” shit. he takes a lot of personal responsibility for other people bc he learned growing up that “no one’s here for you, no one will help you, you will not catch any breaks”. he helps bc if he didn’t, who would? certainly not the dursleys, and that’s what he grew up with.

he does things by himself and the two people he actually trusts, bc he’s learned that authority figures are no help and will only make things worse. he takes situations at face value bc he’s never seen other options in his life, he’s never HAD other options in his life. speaking very personally, that was a serious marker of abuse that i saw in myself – i never thought abt escape, or what i could do to improve my situation, bc i didn’t even see that as an option. the options were survive or don’t, deal w it or don’t, acclimate or implode.

maybe he wasn’t thinking abt what DUMBLEDORE would do, what anyone at hogwarts would do. maybe he was acting off what he knew the dursleys (his main authority figures) would do. the dursleys would let the girl drown. and harry was there, and harry could do something, and so harry did. he took personal responsibility for fleur’s sister’s safety bc all his life he’s learned that authority figures cannot be trusted to do so.

people characterize these aspects of harry as a “hero complex” or a “stupid nobility” or a “lack of common sense”, but i don’t agree with that. i can’t put my finger on exactly what it is. it’s not completely unhealthy; it’s even very useful and responsible on occasion.

it’s called “complex ptsd” and if you get out of the abusive situation before you’re old enough to understand how fucked up it was, like Harry did, you don’t end up with the classic flashbacks so much, just atypical behavior patterns and a high risk of other shit. That’s why Harry is so fucked up by everything that Umbridge does, it’s because he’s being retraumatized in his safe space.

Seriously, the Dursleys would have not only let her drown, they would have let her drown so they could blame Harry for it afterwards. (Although the loudest “Potter, too busy winning to care about anyone else” voice in his head would probably be Snape’s.)

Incidentally this is even more clear in the first and second books, to me. Because Harry DID go to adults and say someone’s trying to steal the stone, and what did the adults do? Did they say, yes, we know, we’re taking precautions, real, good protective measures? Noooo. Did they say, thank you, we’ll look into it, even? Noooo. They said, don’t be silly, it’s not your concern, nothing to see here, little boy, run along and do your schoolwork.

And they said this to a boy whose entire life experience has never involved an adult that can be depended on. And they lied, lied about their own knowledge, said “that’s silly” when they know “that’s true.” And they were too convincing: since he as well knew the truth, what they ended up convincing him was that they didn’t know. And it fit right in with his expectations. Adults, whether actively malicious (the Dursleys, Snape) or well-meaning but oblivious (Mrs. Figg, Harry’s primary-school teachers, the other Hogwarts teachers), can’t be depended on. If anything’s got to be done, Harry and his friends have got to do it himself.

Second book, same thing—they’re headed for the teacher’s lounge to tell the teachers it’s a basilisk, and overhear the teachers saying that Ginny Weasley’s been taken by the monster, and they need to close Hogwarts, and their only plan to rescue Ginny is to send Gilderoy Lockhart—knowing full well he’s a fraud, a coward, and no match for a Cornish pixie, let alone a basilisk. Once again, the adults are flat-out useless and if anyone is going to save Ginny, it’s gotta be Harry and Ron. 

Notably, this is after another ball-drop on the part of the adults: when Harry’s been framed for underage magic and locked up in his room and starved by people who have every intention of keeping him out of Hogwarts forever, it’s other kids, Ron, Fred, and George, who go rescue him, and when the adults find out, one of them punishes and scolds and the other is only interested in how his car worked.

In book three, we meet a couple of adults that are competent, helpful, and willing to listen—Sirius and Remus—and the other adults come in and the end result is, one’s fired and the other has to go on the run lest he have his soul sucked out by dementors. Dumbledore does listen and give them the necessary hints, but it’s Harry, and Hermione this time, who have to do the work.

And then in Order of the Phoenix, in comes the smothering bullshit about how he’s too young to be in the Order and needs to leave everything to the grownups, after the grownups have dropped the ball four years running and are batting zero on the trust-and-listening factor—no wonder he threw a tantrum, I would’ve thrown a tantrum, he was fucking entitled to one.

“Well, that was a bit stupid of you,” said Ginny angrily, “seeing as you don’t know anyone but me who’s been possessed by You-Know-Who, and I can tell you how it feels.”
Harry remained quite still as the impact of these words hit him. Then he turned on the spot to face her.
“I forgot,” he said.

 – OotP

“he does things by himself and the two people he actually trusts… it’s not completely unhealthy; it’s even very useful and responsible on occasion.” – @gaelissfelin

…this.  Harry sees people as: a. him and people he trusts, b. people to be evaded, and c. people in need of help.  When he gets backed into a corner (Voldemort inside his head, heading down the trapdoor alone, off to the DoM alone, into the Forest alone), the circle of people he trusts shrinks down from the DA/OotP, to the Trio, to just himself.  Harry never wants to be a hero or gets off on it, he’s just a person who’s suffered from the bystander effect and doesn’t want to be a bystander himself.

…that’s what it is, why it’s useful, I think.  It’s not a hero complex, it’s an anti-bystander complex.  Sometimes it only takes one person standing up.

When I was younger I never understood why people thought Harry wasn’t thinking things through. But now that I am older and have my diagnosis of PTSD I realize that I was just one abused child identifying with another. It was logical to me that Harry not trust the adults in his life because I couldn’t trust any in mine. No one ever believed me when I told them I was being bullied, my parents were too wrapped up in screaming at each other to give a fuck about me. You go that long feeling like a shadow without a voice and you just start doing things on your own because who the fuck cares about you. You wind up with a protective streak a mile wide because in the back of your mind you know that things can’t change for you but maybe you can change them for someone else even if it means taking their pain as your own. No wonder Harry winds up an Auror, he’s been saving people and getting himself hurt since birth, he needs a psychiatrist to help him but he doesn’t trust anyone so he just throws himself into the only thing he knows how to do rather than healing. It’s by sheer force of will that he’s not catatonic or having PTSD flashbacks every time he goes to work.

@linmanuels

And this is why I’ve always identified with Harry Potter. I also am anti bystander effect, and refuse to let myself remain silent when others are in pain in front of me. I had no one growing up, and I don’t want anyone to feel how I felt my whole life.

I understand now why I was SO upset that people were calling Harry a brat and an ungrateful, moody POS in OOTP – because I have PTSD and I KNEW what I was looking at wasn’t immature acting out bullshit it was trauma manifesting itself and breakdowns and like SERIOUSLY WIZARDING WORLD WHERE’S YOUR MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS 

apparently the same as the muggle world – nowhere to be fucking seen

like this whole series is a fucking rigorous marathon of ‘how much more can we abuse and gaslight this abused child? WATCH AND FIND OUT”

You shouldn’t even have to have experienced abuse to see this. If you really pay attention and use a little empathy you should be able to see from the actual textual evidence that everything Harry does makes perfect sense

the-stray-liger:

The older I get the less I put up with JKR 

“Slytherins didn’t participate in the battle of Hogwarts bc they’d be fighting family” Do you have ANY idea of how much I’d fucking LOVE to fight some ppl in my own goddamn fucking family forget the goddamn wand I’m gonna punch my homophobic racist uncles in the throat à la muggle

societyofbadgers:

wanda-snarksimoff:

I just read “Hufflepuff isn’t a house where you can stick people who don’t fit in the other houses”

But the thing is? It literally it is, Helga Hufflepuff said she would take the rest.

She preferred the loyal and hardworking for her house, but felt that everyone should have a chance. Not a Gryffindor, a Slytherin, or a Ravenclaw? Not a loyal, hardworking Hufflepuff either?

Well that’s okay. Helga Hufflepuff founded her house believing anyone should be given a chance at Hogwarts. Those four archetypes aren’t all that matter, and if you don’t fit any of them Hufflepuff will still welcome you. 

Godric/Rowena/Salazar were perfectly happy to say “You don’t fit into our houses, you can’t come to Hogwarts” and it was only Helga who was willing to say “You might not fit my ideals of a student, but you can still be in my house”

Like. I think that’s super cool. I don’t like it when people shoehorn Hufflepuff into being one and the same like the rest of the houses, sure, loyalty, hardworking, kindness.. that’s the priority.. but it’s truly a place for everyone. And that’s where Hufflepuff’s kindness shines the most.

‘I’ll teach the lot
And treat them just the same.’

‘Good Hufflepuff, she took the rest
and taught them all she knew’

Hufflepuff’s pride as a house comes not only from loyalty, hardworking, toil, and kindness, but from diversity. Something the other founders did not realize the importance of.

I never really thought about this- but you are 100% right.

bixgirl1:

manycoloureddays:

harry gets lots of offers from historians, journalists – just about anyone willing to pick up a quill tbh – but the only authorised biography that gets published in his lifetime is co-written by luna lovegood and lee jordan. part graphic novel (images courtesy of dean thomas), part choose your own adventure, and roughly 80% quibbler-esque misinformation, it is common knowledge that if you want an autograph, the only paper he’ll sign is that book.

Headcanon 100% accepted.